What three commitments actually mean
The phrase "three commitments" appears across Safa Global. It is meant as a test that every Safa Global instrument has to pass before it is offered to anyone.
The three commitments are:
-
Asset-backed by construction. Every instrument Safa Global issues should be backed by identified, valued, and verifiable underlying assets. No fractional fiction. No synthetic exposure. No speculative paper.
-
Aligned with ethical and Islamic financial regulation by design. Instruments are designed with reference to AAOIFI standards, and each will be reviewed by an independent adviser on ethical and Islamic financial regulation before it is issued.
-
Long horizon. We prioritise compounding fundamentals over short-term returns, on a ten-year vision (2026 to 2036).
A note on where we are: Safa Global Capital is being established in Malta, and the Safa Global Foundation is being established in the Qatar Financial Centre. Nothing is offered today. This article describes how the commitments are designed to work, not rights anyone holds yet.
Asset-backed, in operating detail
The asset-backed commitment is the easiest to dilute, because almost every financial product can claim some form of asset backing at some level of abstraction. It is meaningful only if it imposes specific design constraints. We impose four.
Identified. Every instrument should have a specific underlying. The group's 13 operating companies each have a name, a sector, a balance sheet, and a board. A future STAC issue would be backed by Safa Global Capital's planned reserve, held on SGC's own balance sheet, with each reserve asset identifiable. No blind pools.
Valued. Every asset should have a documented valuation method that an outsider can review: audited accounts for operating companies, and a published reserve composition for STAC.
Verifiable. An investor should be able to check that the asset exists, that the valuation is reasonable, and that the right party holds it, through independent audit and asset verification.
Real-economy. The underlying assets should generate real economic activity. "Asset-backed" without real-economy substance is a definitional problem we choose not to have.
The test is whether you can answer four questions in plain English: What is the asset? What is it worth? How do you know? And how do you know it exists?
Ethical and Islamic financial regulation, checked independently
Almost every institution in Islamic finance claims alignment. What that means in practice varies enormously, and the difference usually comes down to one question: who checks, and who do they answer to?
Our design answers it this way. The adviser on ethical and Islamic financial regulation will be appointed through the Safa Global Foundation, not by the management of the company whose products it reviews. The same goes for the independent auditors. The Foundation receives their work and never audits itself.
Before any instrument is issued, the adviser will review its structure and documents, and that review will be published. No adviser has been appointed yet; we will announce the appointment publicly.
The technical references are AAOIFI Standards 17 (Investment Sukuk) and 23 (Wakalah), which bear on central elements of the planned STAC and Sukuk structures.
Long horizon
Every investment manager claims to think long-term. Few have the conditions to act long-term when short-term pressure arrives.
At the instrument level, STAC is designed to be held for years, with an exit route through Safa Global Capital's planned reserve rather than forced redemption windows. At the decision level, documented Investment Committee decisions and independent review before issue add deliberate friction to fast-moving transactions. Each reduces our ability to act on impulse and increases our ability to make decisions that hold up.
Why these three, and not more
We considered adding sustainability, diversification, fairness, and other reasonable commitments. We kept three because each can be tested by an outsider who reads the documents: the asset register, the independent review, the investment record. Three commitments that can be checked are worth more than ten stated as aspirations.
What the commitments are not
They are not a guarantee of investment performance. Asset-backed instruments can lose value. Strategies aligned with ethical and Islamic financial regulation can underperform conventional benchmarks.
They are not a guarantee of regulatory outcomes. Safa Global Capital holds no authorisation today, and how STAC is classified under EU law awaits counsel's opinion.
They are not a substitute for your own due diligence. The point of independent review, published audits and accessible documents is to make diligence possible, not unnecessary.